Book Review-2

 War Talk

Arundhati Roy,
South End Press, Massachusetts, 2003.
Pages: 142.

 

 

Like her previous book The God of Small Things, Arundhati Roy’s recent book War Talk is also the expression of her deep concern and contemplation on human security issues. Arundhati Roy has been a social activist highlighting the pressing issues such as environment and basic human rights. This book comprises six chapters; is cogently written, that engage the reader’s attention. It begins with the explanation of the general apathy towards nuclear war and its horrifying consequences. Whereas, the threats of nuclear holocaust are rising, there is lamentable indifference among the great powers, towards the implementation of the nuclear non-proliferation regimes. The nuclear weapons have held the entire populace of the belligerent countries hostage. The possibility of a nuclear confrontation or a crisis is not a question of only two armies experiencing the anxieties of nuclear brinkmanship. The dread of a nuclear war and the massive annihilation that could follow as a consequence of a nuclear exchange have deprived every individual of the basic security that a state is supposed to ensure. This is the very beginning of terror and insecurity.  The ideas like ‘Ahimsa’ - the pacifist view of life, which although might not be the most popular idea in South Asia has gradually degenerated, and receded into oblivion. The author has criticised the political leaders for not being able to practice and promote the spirit of democracy. Analysing the fear of annihilation and the degenerating of moral values, the author hypothesises that democracy might not be the definite solution for the problems of governance in the region. This is because of different social structures, where the states are still struggling with two systems, the pre-colonial and the post-colonial. They have yet to find their identities as nation states in modern world. This dichotomy has led to the emergence of split societies in the region. While one group is barely keeping body and soul together, the others compete in the race of technological innovation with the affluent states. For democracy to flourish, the gap between the haves and the have-nots must be minimised.

Presenting her own views about the domestic political culture in India, the author has criticised the Hindu politicians for raising communal tensions and antagonism by their chauvinistic and racist rhetoric. The mass killing of Muslims in Gujarat has left a permanent scar on the psyche of many humane Indians. Indian politics has been transformed into an aristocratic mafia of extremists with a name Sangh Parivar, personifying them as a joint family similar to the fascists under Benito Mussolini. The author has criticised the ruling BJP government, which shows her courage and conviction of beliefs. Taking the idea of unjust societies further, the author has drawn an analogy of the September 11, 2001, incident to some previous occurrences in history, which according to her, have come back to haunt the developed states namely the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK). These included the illegal investiture of Augusto Pinochet in Chile, leading to an aristocratic and tyrannical regime that killed thousand of Chileans. Pinochet assumed power on 11 September 1973, with the support of the CIA. The other example is that of the persecution of Palestinians under the British mandate system, which came into force on 11 September 1922, in the Middle East. This gradually usurped the Palestinians of their right to exist as citizens of Palestine.

The author shows notable respect for thinkers like Noam Chomsky, who in their writings have highlighted the corrupted political systems that were the basis of the US Empire of today. Agreeing with Chomsky, she considers that US Empire was being on immoral grounds and through immoral means, like the massive enslavement of the African race. It seems that despite the incidents like September 11, 2001 the US is still bent upon pursuing the realist agenda. While explaining these incidents, the author enlivens the text by quoting some references that might not be traditionally academic, like the revolutionary songs Buffalow Soldier by Bob Marley and Imagine by John Lennon. However, the effects such songs had on the opinion formulation of the people cannot be underrated. The book is written employing the modern tools of research, requiring references to be of an academic nature; however, such unconventional references are a welcome change for the reader. The presentation and expression of the writer is simple, enabling the reader to easily assimilate the intricate ideas. It also presents a thought, which is nothing short of being revolutionary. It is through debate between the conformist and revolutionary ideas that a decent and developed society can be cultivated. In this perspective the book is of great academic value. 

The author is of the opinion that despite the great sufferings sustained by mankind in the course of history, it has not learnt a lesson and is still moving towards self-annihilation that it setout to prevent. The beliefs of the modern leaders are as distorted now, as they were at the time of their nuclear attack on Japan. The extremists, be they Westerns, the Hindus or the Islamists, need to be outlawed, before they lead the world towards the path of destruction. However, the dark clouds do have a silver lining. This hope is fortified, when we consider the example of the recent general elections in India where the poor people, had their voices heard and brought about a significant political change. Similarly, the developing countries and their people have their voice, which is their only weapon. The only way to confront injustices is to raise your voice and concerns in a more proactive manner, by standing up and being counted.

 

Ahmed Ijaz Malik

Assistant Research Officer, IPRI 

 

Copyright - IPRI 2000-2003

Home | IPRI Staff | Publications | Events | Feedback | Web Mail | Search | Contact