Skip to content Skip to footer

Time to harmonize our counter terrorism effort

birlikte yaşadığı günden beri kendisine arkadaşları hep ezik sikiş ve süzük gibi lakaplar takılınca dışarıya bile çıkmak porno istemeyen genç adam sürekli evde zaman geçirir Artık dışarıdaki sikiş yaşantıya kendisini adapte edemeyeceğinin farkında olduğundan sex gif dolayı hayatını evin içinde kurmuştur Fakat babası çok hızlı sikiş bir adam olduğundan ve aşırı sosyalleşebilen bir karaktere sahip porno resim oluşundan ötürü öyle bir kadınla evlenmeye karar verir ki evleneceği sikiş kadının ateşi kendisine kadar uzanıyordur Bu kadar seksi porno ve çekici milf üvey anneye sahip olduğu için şanslı olsa da her gece babasıyla sikiş seks yaparken duyduğu seslerden artık rahatsız oluyordu Odalarından sex izle gelen inleme sesleri ve yatağın gümbürtüsünü duymaktan dolayı kusacak sikiş duruma gelmiştir Her gece yaşanan bu ateşli sex dakikalarından dolayı hd porno canı sıkılsa da kendisi kimseyi sikemediği için biraz da olsa kıskanıyordu

Judicial Commission comprising Justice Qazi Faez Isa that investigated the August 8 deadly terrorist attack in Quetta has reported ‘monumental failure’ of the interior ministry and Balochistan government towards combating terrorism. Even though there has been visible successes in the counter terrorism effort with regard to frequency of such attacks, terrorist outfits retain the capacity to carry out periodic high profile attacks. And 2016 was a bad year in this context. Though Terrorist carried out high causality attacks, against soft target, in all provinces, Balochistan was the worst hit province.  While government(s) are right in taking credit for some of the encouraging statistics, Commission’s findings correctly indicate that gains are fragile and complacency could lead to reversals.

Commission was constituted by the Supreme Court and its report was also made public on court’s orders. Commission has reported that the ‘irresponsible’ post-attack statements of CM and home minister Balochistan had undermined the credibility of the provincial government. As expected, the report has stirred a controversy leading to politicization of its content. Balochistan government has taken the report relatively more sportingly than federal interior ministry.

Had the report remained confidential, the controversial nature of the commission would not have become a public knowledge. And by not releasing the report for public consumption, the Supreme Court could have saved the Judicial Commissioner the agony of exposure to a situation in which it won’t be tenable for him to go public in his defence.

Commission had become controversial even before it had been constituted, it was pointed out by the Balochistan government that the Supreme Court did not have legal cover to appoint such commission: “In case the inquiry contemplated by the court’s October 6 order is conducted, it would set a precedent which could seriously jeopardise the entire criminal justice system in the country.” Provincial government had also brought to attention the Futility of the commission: “the concurrent and contemporaneous conduct of (Commission led) investigation on the one hand and inquiry (provincial government instituted joint inquiry) on the other hand is likely to seriously prejudice, hinder, hamper and in effect negate the principles of the due process of law.” The provincial government had also voiced concern that “neither the precise powers to be exercised by the commission nor its terms of reference have been specified in the court’s October 6 order.” And that two parallel investigations could lead towards conflicting findings and thus create confusion. Trust deficit was also expressed against the Commissioner by the Balochistan government.

Most of the objections of the provincial government were, however, flimsy; and keeping in view frequent recurrences of similar nature in Balochistan over the preceding months, formation of Commission was indeed commendable.  At the same time, keeping in view the attitude of unacceptability demonstrated by the Balochistan government with regard to jurisdiction of the commission and finger pointing towards the persona of Justice Qazi, it would have been in the fitness of things to appoint some other person as Judicial Commissioner; and may be Justice Qazi would have himself opted out of this assignment.

Though most of the findings of the Commission related to shortfalls of our counter terrorism effort and inadequacies with regard to implementation of National Action Plan (NAP) are accurate and thus praiseworthy, Commission, unfortunately, did indulge in commenting on additional matters to the extent of even including heresy in the findings, which led of erosion of report’s credibility.

Decision to make the entire content of the report public has contributed nothing towards avoiding the recurrence of similar nature. Purpose would have been better served if irrelevant personal remark were expunged before releasing it to the public. The rubble it has roused may result in burying some very valuable findings of the Commission under the heaps of indignation of those who are responsible to implement the report. In all probability, the report may be consigned to dormancy.

The Commission has pointed out that “If the functionaries of the state had established a bank of forensic information on past attacks, and pursued the cases, they might have prevented the attacks of August 8,” it reports. And that through irresponsible press statements by CM Balochistan and his cabinet colleagues “fabricated leads were broadcast, disrupting the investigation and creating false expectations.”  The Commission has also pointed fingers at Federal Interior Ministry: “The ministry’s National Security Internal Policy is not being implemented”.

Commission has observed that no meeting of the Executive Committee of National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) had been convened since December 31, 2014. There is need to find out why interior ministry under the previous and current government has been persistently reluctant to let NACTA stand on its feet. Commission has pointed out that the NAP is not a plan in any structured or meaningful way, nor has its goals been monitored or implemented. May be the Commissioner was unduly harsh about this document of national consensus, though his assessment regarding its poor implementation are in order.

The Commission has also correctly pointed out that country’s western borders are not monitored, and even from the official crossings there is a free and unrestricted flow of people and goods, including terrorists, weapons, ammunition, and other contraband. It has aptly proposed that entry into and departure from Pakistan be properly monitored.

Commission has pointed out that the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Inter-Faith Harmony is not fulfilling its most basic mandate for interfaith harmony. There is no registration or monitoring of madrassas. Touching the holy cow media, the Commission has observed that the media has a very few stories about the victims of terrorism. Media coverage seems to be centred on the propaganda of terrorists. The Commission has recommended that if the media broadcasts and propagates the views of terrorists, then those doing so must be prosecuted.

Commission is of the view that solution to the menace of extremism and terrorism is straightforward: “Abide by the laws…It is an abomination to have laws, and not enforce them.”

Interior Minister has rejected as ‘one-sided’ and has vowed to challenge it at every available forum. The opposition parties have submitted an adjournment motion in the National Assembly Secretariat seeking the resignation of the interior minister.

Commission was apparently tasked to investigate the deadly attack, however, it chose to also venture into governance related issues and, in all probability and may be inadvertently, became a conduit for airing the system related grievances by Chief Secretary Balochistan. Certainly better forums, than a typical judicial commission are available to reconcile such matters. And an officer of the stature of Chief Secretary should have had the courage to take stand and settle such matters or quit, rather than venting his grievances against the system of which he is, and continues to be, an important member, rather than finding the shoulder of a judicial commission to lean against and cry.

 Entire saga reflects how our governments (federal as well as provincial), institutions and agencies tend to exceed their rightful mandate and cross over into legitimate sphere of others. Also it lays bare of another unfortunate reality that when genuine weakness are pointed out, how governments and other entities go defensive and do everything to create an impression that such reports are not credible. The mud-slinging in the aftermath of report has created a bad taste and left a common Pakistani feel more insecure with regard to   governments’ assurances in the context of its counter terrorism effort.

Now all eyes on Prime Minister, hopefully he will a look at the matter with an apolitical lens and see that chaff is sifted from the corn. National counter terrorism effort stands to gain by implementing relevant findings and recommendations of the Commission.

Pakistan Observer, December 28, 2016.

Disclaimer: Views expressed are of the writer and are not necessarily reflective of IPRI policy.

Show CommentsClose Comments

Leave a comment


IPRI is one of the oldest non-partisan think-tanks on all facets of National Security including international relations & law, strategic studies, governance & public policy and economic security in Pakistan. Established in 1999, IPRI is affiliated with the National Security Division (NSD), Government of Pakistan.


 Office 505, 5th Floor, Evacuee Trust Complex, Sir Agha Khan Road, F-5/1, Islamabad, Pakistan

  +92 51 9211346-9

  +92 51 9211350


To receive email updates on new products and announcements